Snapdragon Chip Design Gen 3: Qualcomm vs ARM Licensing Conflict Explained

NEWS
By
23 October 2024
Qualcomm faces uncertainty as ARM cancels its chip design license, threatening the future of Snapdragon 8 Elite and Oryon cores
Snapdragon Chip Design Gen 3: Qualcomm vs. ARM Licensing Conflict Explained
( Image credits: Qualcomm )

The technology landscape is witnessing a significant legal standoff between Qualcomm and ARM, centered around the development and licensing of Snapdragon chip designs. Specifically, Qualcomm’s latest flagship processor, the Snapdragon 8 Elite, has sparked tensions due to its use of custom Oryon cores instead of ARM’s standard Cortex architecture. ARM’s recent decision to cancel Qualcomm’s chip design license could have far-reaching implications, particularly for Snapdragon’s future chip designs, including the highly anticipated Snapdragon chip design Gen 3.

The Nuvia Acquisition and Custom Cores

In 2021, Qualcomm took a strategic leap by acquiring Nuvia, a startup known for its expertise in custom core development. This acquisition allowed Qualcomm to break away from its reliance on ARM’s “vanilla” Cortex cores and create its own custom Oryon cores for the Snapdragon series. The custom Oryon cores made their debut in the Snapdragon X series chips for laptops and mobile devices, but this shift soon caught ARM’s attention.

ARM argued that the licensing agreements Nuvia had in place did not automatically transfer to Qualcomm after the acquisition. ARM insisted that Qualcomm needed to renegotiate these licenses to continue using Nuvia’s intellectual property. However, Qualcomm never renegotiated the terms, and this unresolved conflict set the stage for ARM’s legal actions.

ARM Cancels Qualcomm’s Chip Design License

Ahead of a high-stakes trial scheduled for December, ARM made a preemptive move by canceling Qualcomm’s chip design license. This decision could prevent Qualcomm from selling chips powered by its custom Oryon cores, including the flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite. ARM issued a 60-day cancellation notice, which gives both companies a limited window to renegotiate. If no agreement is reached, Qualcomm may be forced to halt the production and sale of Oryon-powered chips.

Interestingly, the upcoming Snapdragon chip design Gen 3 remains unaffected by this dispute, as it continues to use ARM’s Cortex cores. This highlights the growing tension between Qualcomm’s push for custom core designs and ARM’s insistence on licensing renegotiations.

Qualcomm’s Response

Despite the license cancellation, Qualcomm remains confident in its legal standing. The company dismissed ARM’s actions as a last-minute tactic designed to disrupt the upcoming trial. Qualcomm insists that ARM’s claims are baseless and that its rights under the original agreement will be upheld in court.

A Qualcomm representative stated, “ARM’s attempt to cancel the license is just another unfounded threat, designed to interfere with Qualcomm’s innovation in custom cores like Oryon. We are confident that this dispute will be resolved in our favor.”

Qualcomm has also accused ARM of engaging in anti-competitive practices, alleging that the cancellation notice is part of a broader strategy to strong-arm its partners and increase royalty rates. With Qualcomm continuing to focus on custom core development, particularly through innovations like the Snapdragon chip design Gen 3, the outcome of this legal battle could shape the future of chip licensing in the tech industry.

Potential Boost for RISC-V Architecture

As Qualcomm and ARM lock horns over licensing, another player may stand to benefit: RISC-V, an open-source architecture that offers an alternative to ARM’s proprietary cores. Qualcomm, alongside Google, has been exploring the potential of RISC-V as a more flexible and royalty-free platform for mobile devices. Should Qualcomm lose the legal battle with ARM, it could accelerate its shift toward developing RISC-V-based chips, further disrupting the market.

The open-source nature of RISC-V could democratize chip design, allowing Qualcomm and other manufacturers to innovate without being tied to ARM’s licensing structure. This, in turn, could fuel a broader adoption of RISC-V across the industry, as companies look for alternatives to the costly and restrictive licensing agreements imposed by ARM.

The High Stakes of the Qualcomm-ARM Dispute

The upcoming trial will determine the future direction of Qualcomm’s custom chip designs, particularly those involving Oryon cores. If ARM’s cancellation notice is upheld, Qualcomm could be forced to halt its custom chip production, a blow to its ambitious plans for mobile and laptop processors. However, if Qualcomm prevails, it would secure its right to continue pushing forward with innovations like the Snapdragon chip design Gen 3, setting a precedent for future custom core development.

Receive daily updates, inspiration, and exclusive deals delivered to your inbox.

Sign up to receive breaking news, reviews, opinions, top tech deals, and more.

By submitting your information, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and confirm you are 16 or older.

Share this page:

Copyright ©2024 TechyMenia. All Rights Reserved.

This article may include affiliate links. Please refer to our privacy policy for further details.

Related Articles

Top 10 AI Tools for Productivity in 2024
Published 11 December 2024 –
By Derek Louie
Chris Evans Marvel Return: Everything We Know So Far
Published 10 December 2024 –
By Grayson Reed
Today's NYT Strands Hints, Answers and Tips for Sept. 15, #196
Published 18 November 2024 –
By Landon Cole

About Author

More From TechyMenia

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Steps Up the Game with Ultra-Smooth 185Hz Display
Published 1 November 2024 –
By Grayson Reed
Dropbox Jobs in the Spotlight as 20% of Workforce Faces Layoffs
Published 31 October 2024 –
By Maya Ellis
Google Prepares Gemini 2.0 Launch to Compete with OpenAI’s Orion Model
Published 28 October 2024 –
By Ryker Westin
Huawei Phones
Published 26 October 2024 –
By Derek Louie